Tag: "economic"
Local Seminar Series – Weeks 1-4
I gave a 4 week seminar for our local community and surrounding area. Here is the audio for all four weeks as well as the PowerPoint presentations. Click on the title in red above to be taken to the page where you can download the audio and .pps files.
PowerPoint link Week 1
PowerPoint link Week 2
PowerPoint link Week 3
View PostThe “C” word is back – contagion
Not since the early days of the sub-prime mortgage crisis have we heard the word “contagion” bantered about so much. We were assured then that it would be “contained.” It wasn’t This won’t be either.
ECB May Have to Turn To Nuclear Option
Last time it was 18 months between the initiation of the sub-prime and the financial crisis. I don’t think we’ll have that long this time.
Illegal immigration – the next hot button issue
Just has has been predicted, illegal immigration will be the next agenda item for the Obama administration. The law that was courageously passed by Arizona will help speed the process. As with any law, it isn’t perfect. There are troubling issues about presenting papers to prove citizenship that must be addressed, and the application of the law will surely be tested.
However, I would like to address a hot button topic that I am sure will ruffle a few feathers. That is the subject of “racial profiling.” This term has been constructed and defined for the sole purpose of hindering the investigation of crimes by criminals. There are some stubborn things called “facts” that people do not want to deal with when it comes to the issue of illegal immigration.
- Fact – The vast, vast majority of illegal immigrants in this nation are Hispanic. 95% plus is a legitimate estimate.
- Fact – Had we been enforcing laws already on the books, we would not have this problem.
- Fact – The illegal immigrants have been draining resources from state and local budgets for decades now. We are in a time economically when we must make the hard choices.
- Fact – United States citizens are granted rights by our Constitution. Foreigners are protected from undue persecution and improper trial, but they are not granted the rights of U.S. citizens.
That brings me to the issue of racial profiling. Let me make my point by an illustration. It isn’t a pleasant one but makes my point.
If we are to use the logic of those who decry using racial profiling in the enforcement of law, then we would have to apply that logic to other physical characteristics that distinguish one group of people from another. Take gender for example. Gender, like race, is something that is easily recognizable (except in some large cities). Now lets say that law enforcement not only is prohibited from using “racial profiling” but they are also prohibited from using “gender profiling.” Hmm…
It is a fact that over 95% of sexual assaults are committed by men. What happens when tragically, a woman is assaulted? She gives a description to police that will help them catch the criminal. But applying the logic of the left and “racial profiling,” she should not be allowed to identify the gender of her assailant. It matters not that she saw him. It matters not that 95% of sexual assaults are committed by men. She cannot name her assailants gender. And police must consider males and females alike when investigating the crime. Rapists would love that law, and I am sure support it wholeheartedly. If practiced, it would hinder their arrest and imprisonment.
Absurd? You bet.
What is the difference then when police are sent to investigate a report of a group of Hispanic men who are working a job site yet have not produced identification that they are legally entitled to work. It needs to be investigated. All information is taken down. But the race of the men cannot be identified. Police must go out and look for them without considering race, despite 95% of illegal aliens are Hispanic (and they could be identified by witnesses as being Hispanic). Hispanic illegal immigrants would love that law (and they do.) If practiced, it would hinder their arrest and deportation.
Absurd? Should be.
In the real world, if such restrictions were placed on law enforcement, (in both cases) they would still use “profiling” to identify suspects. They know the statistics. They know who to look for. Cries of “racial profiling” or “gender profiling” are simply fodder for the criminals to use to hide behind political correctness.
Don’t think for a minute I am equating illegal aliens with rapists other than to make a simple point (yes you lefties, that is the first place you would go with this). The point is this. In both cases, the people are criminals. (people don’t want to hear that about Hispanic illegals, yet it is one of those stubborn facts that “reform” wishes to remedy). In both cases, they have an easily identifiable physical characteristic that drastically shrinks the pool of likely suspects. Identifying that identifiable characteristic is simply good practice.
Both criminals deserve the punishment the law affords. Prison for one, deportation for the other. The latter has the opportunity to do it the right way – apply for citizenship and go through the process if they wish. But they do not want to follow the law. Instead, they want amnesty – forgiveness without consequence. I’m sorry, but to be consistent we would then have to apply that standard to the rapist as well. Maybe not such a good idea after all…
The left wants to assign degrees to the debate to cloud the issue. It is then that their relativistic worldview comes into plain sight. “You can’t compare a rapist to a Hispanic single mom who is just trying to provide for her family!” Yes I can, and I just did. They both have broken the law. While I would feel empathy for the mother and wish to help her through other means to provide for her family (this is where the church should come in) her breaking of the law cannot be accepted.
Right and wrong. Standards. Absolutes. Difficult things to be sure. But necessary for a functioning society.
Obama’s Loyalties Exposed
The upcoming debate on the issue of illegal immigration should prove to be an interesting one. The Obama/Reid/Pelosi axis ignored the will of the majority of Americans and passed Obamacare despite their protests. Watch what happens if/when they ramrod through an amnesty bill. They will have pressed forward with the wishes of a small minority of foreigners (some of whom by the way hoisted their flag above an upside down American flag at a school in California when immigration reform with some teeth was proposed in 2006). What a contrast! The fallout of such a move should be interesting to watch. It will certainly make clear that their agenda and loyalties are not with the U.S. citizen and the Constitution, but rather with the globalists and the interests of the U.N.
Hold the Race Card Lefties
Oh, and by the way, for those who want to label me a racist because of this post? Good luck. I have two adopted Guatemalan sons whom I love dearly. I would not want them to be subject to discrimination based on their race. However, if they are in an area where a crime is committed and their “profile” fits the criminal and if there is reasonable cause to suspect they may have been involved – let the questions be asked. Their innocence would soon be evident.
The agenda of the left is being exposed more and more each day. They are rushing toward the finish line of Marxism as fast as they can run. Has “the great awakening” of the tea party come in time to stop them? In part, that answer depends on your participation. We will know within a few short years.
Intersting article by Gary North
Gary North makes some interesting observations regarding our current political climate.
“By the time of the election in November 2008, the two stimulus packages were history and the Federal Reserve had more than doubled the monetary base. For the first time since 1914, the Federal Reserve System was under widespread attack by a significant minority of the public.
Then came Obama’s stimulus package. We can date the rise of the Tea Party movement from that event. It has continued to grow. Recent polls indicate that at least 25% of the voters identify with the Tea Party movement or express sympathy with it.”
I am not sure where he gets his 25% number, but those I have seen quoted are in the 30% to 40% range. Either way, his point which follows is significant from a historical perspective. Furthermore, I have seen estimates that up to 60% to 70% of Independent voters sympathize with the Tea Party. Those are the important ones.
“The speed of this development is unprecedented in modern American history. No swing voting bloc this large has ever appeared in a one-year period. This is a Congressional election year. The bloc did not exist in November 2008.
This is the wildest political wild card in modern American history. There is no organizational chain of command. Ron Paul represents its main ideas, but he does not give it marching orders. No one does.”
His last comment is the Tea Party’s strength and weakness. My feel is that it will be a greater strength. If nobody is able to give the party its marching orders, that makes it much more difficult to be hijacked by the Republican establishment and run down the neo-con road.
“Incumbent politicians who are up for election this fall now see what is coming. Their electoral plans have to factor in the Tea Party voters. Even Congressmen in safe districts have to think about what will be the shape of the new Congress in January 2011.
Nancy Pelosi should be making mental plans to turn over her gavel as Speaker of the House.”
Wishful thinking maybe. It will take an act of God to move the House to Republican hands. Strong gains yes, but there are 7 months between now and the election. Watch what tricks the current administration pull out of their hats. Amnesty for illegal immigrants, and a battle with the evil bankers are just a warm up.
“When Ron Paul got 41% of the vote in the Rasmussen poll a week ago, with Obama at 42%, that sent a message to Congress. No sitting House member has ever matched a sitting President in a public opinion poll. That the member has been the lone wolf in the House on spending bills for three decades indicates a monumental shift of opinion in the public’s sentiments.”
This is quite telling. Staying power is what counts. Right now momentum is on RP’s side. If it peaks too soon, that is a problem and has been a mis-calculation of politicians since politicians have been around. It’s tempting to soak up the praise when it comes your way. The MSM would love to have RP flame out.
“Pelosi’s ramrodding operation of Obamacare was the last straw. She was adamant: the voters be damned. This was the same attitude that Congress displayed in October 2008, when it passed the Paulson-Bush bailout bill. Incumbent Republicans were swept out of office in the House in November 2008. The public got its revenge.”
The sweep by Dems in 08′ was about much more than one bill. The independents (and some moderate republicans) bought the messiah’s message of hope and change.
“This November, the public is likely to get its revenge again. The dark cloud, no larger than a man’s hand – Ron Paul’s hand – a year ago has become a thundercloud. It is heading for Washington, D.C.”
Let’s pray he is right. What continues to disturb me is that there is little mention about restoration of this nation to its Judeo/Christian roots. God’s role in this restoration process is largely absent from the patriot commentary. It is there, but often as an afterthought. Get this saying in mind:
Patriots without God will be slaughtered. Patriots with God will not be stopped.
It’s that simple.
Update on the most important chart…
Here is an update on “the most important chart in 100 years.” The dollar broke out to the upside, but did so in a manner that suggests a short squeeze more than a major turn. If it can consolidate here without turning down sharply, it should set up a sideways trading range. It may even make 80 for a final test of the major multi-decade breakdown level. However it could just be a bull trap where it turns back down violently. It will bear watching closely. 74 has now become a very important technical level. When it is broken to the downside it will bring on accelerated selling similar to the buying we have seen on the upside breakout.
Family Economics Conference
I would like to invite you to a family economics conference, scheduled for March 5 and 6th in Castle Rock, Colorado. I will be speaking there, but more important, some of the most respected speakers in the country will be there to discuss family economics from a biblical perspective. These include Scott Brown, Dennis Peacocke, Kevin Swanson, and R.C. Sproul Jr.
Early registration ends December 12th but you can register after that time.





Agenda – Grinding America Down (5 star!)


Recent Comments